http://www.hdtvok.com/2008/01/08/wwe-in-hd-but-not-on-cox/ Putting HDTV on the Map in Oklahoma Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:47:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.hdtvok.com/2008/01/08/wwe-in-hd-but-not-on-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-23287 JLEE Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:27:25 +0000 http://www.hdtvok.com/2008/01/08/wwe-in-hd-but-not-on-cox/#comment-23287 Called Direct Tv. $39.95 for non HD Royal Rumble channel 123. $49.95 for HD Royal Rumble on channel 98. Not sure if it is worth it for the extra $10. But we will see. Called Direct Tv. $39.95 for non HD Royal Rumble channel 123. $49.95 for HD Royal Rumble on channel 98. Not sure if it is worth it for the extra $10. But we will see.

]]> http://www.hdtvok.com/2008/01/08/wwe-in-hd-but-not-on-cox/comment-page-1/#comment-23283 ggore Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:41:54 +0000 http://www.hdtvok.com/2008/01/08/wwe-in-hd-but-not-on-cox/#comment-23283 NBC/Universal requires that USA-HD, SciFi-HD, CNBC-HD and Bravo-HD all be added at the SAME time to a cable system. Individual channels may not be added to a system's lineup and certain carriage location/tier requirements must be met as well. All this may be what is holding things up with Cox. NBC/Universal requires that USA-HD, SciFi-HD, CNBC-HD and Bravo-HD all be added at the SAME time to a cable system. Individual channels may not be added to a system’s lineup and certain carriage location/tier requirements must be met as well. All this may be what is holding things up with Cox.

]]>