<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KWTV-DT to Stay on UHF 39</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/</link>
	<description>Putting HDTV on the Map in Oklahoma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:50:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: trueview</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24435</link>
		<dc:creator>trueview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24435</guid>
		<description>no but the network feed has HD available which 30 and Dish does not pick up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no but the network feed has HD available which 30 and Dish does not pick up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: servicetech</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24434</link>
		<dc:creator>servicetech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24434</guid>
		<description>Does 30 carry a lot of HD programming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does 30 carry a lot of HD programming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trueview</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24432</link>
		<dc:creator>trueview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24432</guid>
		<description>i was afraid of that myself.  just looks odd with 39-1 in the upper left corner when I turn it on and channel 9 in the bottom right corner.  

when I reprogrammed the turner i found two more low power stations using digital transmission tho one just shows up on the turner listing but does not come in at all.  yet channel 48 stays analog.  I am asked a number of times, at work, when 30 will actually be in HD.  I do not know -- does anyone have an idea?  they advertise a lot about the HD and I wish they and Dish would take the hint for their sake -- they are Mexican and undstand the language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was afraid of that myself.  just looks odd with 39-1 in the upper left corner when I turn it on and channel 9 in the bottom right corner.  </p>
<p>when I reprogrammed the turner i found two more low power stations using digital transmission tho one just shows up on the turner listing but does not come in at all.  yet channel 48 stays analog.  I am asked a number of times, at work, when 30 will actually be in HD.  I do not know &#8212; does anyone have an idea?  they advertise a lot about the HD and I wish they and Dish would take the hint for their sake &#8212; they are Mexican and undstand the language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickster</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24430</link>
		<dc:creator>rickster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24430</guid>
		<description>trueview
I agree with your comments..BUT
Unfortunately they will continue to use &quot;9&quot; and NOT &quot;39&quot; for the foreseeable future..
I think, they think it will maintain their viewer loyalty.
The FCC data base currently shows a MIX of old and new channel numbers.
SO, maybe the stations will eventually get with the program and show their real/actual channel number !!!
BUT, don&#039;t hold your breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trueview<br />
I agree with your comments..BUT<br />
Unfortunately they will continue to use &#8220;9&#8243; and NOT &#8220;39&#8243; for the foreseeable future..<br />
I think, they think it will maintain their viewer loyalty.<br />
The FCC data base currently shows a MIX of old and new channel numbers.<br />
SO, maybe the stations will eventually get with the program and show their real/actual channel number !!!<br />
BUT, don&#8217;t hold your breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trueview</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24428</link>
		<dc:creator>trueview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24428</guid>
		<description>does this mean that &quot;Big 9&quot; [ups told my age] will id itself as channel 39?  I wish all that did not revert to the origianal channel number or could not because their channel simply is no longer available would just say the actual channel they are using.

it would me nice to have the 5.1 surround alright.  it has spoiled me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this mean that &#8220;Big 9&#8243; [ups told my age] will id itself as channel 39?  I wish all that did not revert to the origianal channel number or could not because their channel simply is no longer available would just say the actual channel they are using.</p>
<p>it would me nice to have the 5.1 surround alright.  it has spoiled me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: servicetech</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24427</link>
		<dc:creator>servicetech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24427</guid>
		<description>Same here, I&#039;d like to know which to set my Windows Media Center for. WMC picks up both feeds, not sure if they will relabel 9.2 to 9.1 and if the channel will need reprogrammed.

Hopefully we will have enough notice to make the switch. If we are REALLY lucky we might get 5.1 sound out of the deal (KWTV is the ONLY local network that doesn&#039;t)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here, I&#8217;d like to know which to set my Windows Media Center for. WMC picks up both feeds, not sure if they will relabel 9.2 to 9.1 and if the channel will need reprogrammed.</p>
<p>Hopefully we will have enough notice to make the switch. If we are REALLY lucky we might get 5.1 sound out of the deal (KWTV is the ONLY local network that doesn&#8217;t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdeatherage</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24426</link>
		<dc:creator>mdeatherage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24426</guid>
		<description>But...once they stop broadcasting on VHF channel 9, won&#039;t they change UHF 39 to be &quot;9-1&quot; anyway?

Or is the advice simply that after the change, current 9-1 will go away and current 9-2 will still be there until they rescan?

(Just wanting to be clear...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;once they stop broadcasting on VHF channel 9, won&#8217;t they change UHF 39 to be &#8220;9-1&#8243; anyway?</p>
<p>Or is the advice simply that after the change, current 9-1 will go away and current 9-2 will still be there until they rescan?</p>
<p>(Just wanting to be clear&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Whiteman</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/comment-page-1/#comment-24425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/15/kwtv-dt-to-stay-on-uhf-39/#comment-24425</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, we&#039;ll have plenty of notice. My DVR failed to record CSI last night because of a weak signal on 9-1 so I&#039;ve now switched it to 9-2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, we&#8217;ll have plenty of notice. My DVR failed to record CSI last night because of a weak signal on 9-1 so I&#8217;ve now switched it to 9-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
