<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is KOCO-DT off the Air?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/</link>
	<description>Putting HDTV on the Map in Oklahoma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24534</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24534</guid>
		<description>KTEN Ada, Ardmore, Sherman- Denison is apparently adding ABC as digital 10.3 in HD in May. KTEN broadcasts on UHF 26 from a 1,400 foot tower about 10 miles north of Tishomingo.
Should allow southern Oklahoma to have full network coverage locally over the air. Something they have never had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KTEN Ada, Ardmore, Sherman- Denison is apparently adding ABC as digital 10.3 in HD in May. KTEN broadcasts on UHF 26 from a 1,400 foot tower about 10 miles north of Tishomingo.<br />
Should allow southern Oklahoma to have full network coverage locally over the air. Something they have never had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDTV In Oklahoma &#187; KOCO-TV Gets New Digital Antenna</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24528</link>
		<dc:creator>HDTV In Oklahoma &#187; KOCO-TV Gets New Digital Antenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24528</guid>
		<description>[...] 5000 passed along this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5000 passed along this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aurora5000</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24527</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurora5000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24527</guid>
		<description>http://www.koco.com/news/23040645/detail.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.koco.com/news/23040645/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.koco.com/news/23040645/detail.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aurora5000</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24526</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurora5000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24526</guid>
		<description>From koco.com

Eyewitness News 5 has received a new digital antenna to help improve its over-the-air signal.

The state-of-the-art antenna stands nearly 1,500 feet high and uses an omni-directional, multi-polar signal that should help viewers tune in KOCO-TV better.

Construction crews will take the old analog antenna down from the tower and replace it with the new one over the next few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From koco.com</p>
<p>Eyewitness News 5 has received a new digital antenna to help improve its over-the-air signal.</p>
<p>The state-of-the-art antenna stands nearly 1,500 feet high and uses an omni-directional, multi-polar signal that should help viewers tune in KOCO-TV better.</p>
<p>Construction crews will take the old analog antenna down from the tower and replace it with the new one over the next few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24474</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24474</guid>
		<description>However, KWTX 10 in Waco is more than 80 miles from Cedar Hill where the KTVT 11 DFW transmiiter is located.  KXII 12 transmits from just south of Madill and is about 100 miles from 11 in Cedar Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, KWTX 10 in Waco is more than 80 miles from Cedar Hill where the KTVT 11 DFW transmiiter is located.  KXII 12 transmits from just south of Madill and is about 100 miles from 11 in Cedar Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24473</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24473</guid>
		<description>I think the rule is that Adjacent VHF DTV channel transmitters must be spaced less than 14.9 miles or greater than 68.35 miles.  UHF transmitters have adjacent channel spacing requirements something like that also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rule is that Adjacent VHF DTV channel transmitters must be spaced less than 14.9 miles or greater than 68.35 miles.  UHF transmitters have adjacent channel spacing requirements something like that also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quanah</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24472</link>
		<dc:creator>quanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24472</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Cowboy. Ch 10 in Waco has moved power up to 39,000 watts.

One thing that confuses me. I didnt think DT could have adjacent channel interference. FCC tells me the power increase for ch 11 was denied because of interference to 12 and 10.

12 and 10 are owned by Gray Broadcasting. 

Waco has ch 9 (25,000 watts) and ch 10 (39,000 watts). Transmitters are about 9 km apart.

I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Cowboy. Ch 10 in Waco has moved power up to 39,000 watts.</p>
<p>One thing that confuses me. I didnt think DT could have adjacent channel interference. FCC tells me the power increase for ch 11 was denied because of interference to 12 and 10.</p>
<p>12 and 10 are owned by Gray Broadcasting. </p>
<p>Waco has ch 9 (25,000 watts) and ch 10 (39,000 watts). Transmitters are about 9 km apart.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24470</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24470</guid>
		<description>KXII Sherman/Denison/Ardmore does now broadcast DTV on VHF 12. KTVT 11 in Fort Worth could not increase their power to adequate levels without causing interference for KXII 12 and therefore moved to UHF 19.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KXII Sherman/Denison/Ardmore does now broadcast DTV on VHF 12. KTVT 11 in Fort Worth could not increase their power to adequate levels without causing interference for KXII 12 and therefore moved to UHF 19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWVoiceovers</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24466</link>
		<dc:creator>JWVoiceovers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24466</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken, last year KXII in Sherman/Denison moved from UHF 20 back to their original VHF 12 during the DTV Transition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, last year KXII in Sherman/Denison moved from UHF 20 back to their original VHF 12 during the DTV Transition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quanah</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24465</link>
		<dc:creator>quanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24465</guid>
		<description>The reference to KUSA Denver was simply to illustrate some stations like high VHF.

Now I&#039;m finding requests by tons of VHF stations for power increases. KCAU ch 9 in Souix City, IA tells me the FCC did not delagate enough power for VHF stations. KCAU, along with many other stations do not want a move to UHF. Some VHF (including low VHF) stations are seeking up to quadruple power increases.

CH 10 in Waco broadcasts 25,000 watts. Old analog 10 used 316,000 watts, reduced to 204,000 watts after DT 53 turned on. Ch 10 tells me all is well, so far. However, I believe they too would welcome a power increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reference to KUSA Denver was simply to illustrate some stations like high VHF.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m finding requests by tons of VHF stations for power increases. KCAU ch 9 in Souix City, IA tells me the FCC did not delagate enough power for VHF stations. KCAU, along with many other stations do not want a move to UHF. Some VHF (including low VHF) stations are seeking up to quadruple power increases.</p>
<p>CH 10 in Waco broadcasts 25,000 watts. Old analog 10 used 316,000 watts, reduced to 204,000 watts after DT 53 turned on. Ch 10 tells me all is well, so far. However, I believe they too would welcome a power increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24464</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24464</guid>
		<description>KXII in Ardmore Sherman Denison broadcasts on channel 20 UHF and is not bothered by VHF channel 11, and it&#039;s hard for me to believe that a Denver, Colorado station is bothered by a station in Fort Worth, Texas.  &lt;strong&gt;Oh, my gosh, there&#039;s a station in Fairbanks, Alaska using channel 11 also!  I hope that doesn&#039;t bother them.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KXII in Ardmore Sherman Denison broadcasts on channel 20 UHF and is not bothered by VHF channel 11, and it&#8217;s hard for me to believe that a Denver, Colorado station is bothered by a station in Fort Worth, Texas.  <strong>Oh, my gosh, there&#8217;s a station in Fairbanks, Alaska using channel 11 also!  I hope that doesn&#8217;t bother them.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quanah</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24463</link>
		<dc:creator>quanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24463</guid>
		<description>B. Williams,

Now I learn that the FCC has rejected KTVT&#039;s use of ch 11 due to interference to Gray owned stations ch 12 in Ardmore-Sherman-Denison and Ch 10 in Waco. It appears  the FCC is mandating ch 19.

Details on interference patterns are available at the FCC website.

I&#039;ll study this further. I hope I&#039;m understanding all of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B. Williams,</p>
<p>Now I learn that the FCC has rejected KTVT&#8217;s use of ch 11 due to interference to Gray owned stations ch 12 in Ardmore-Sherman-Denison and Ch 10 in Waco. It appears  the FCC is mandating ch 19.</p>
<p>Details on interference patterns are available at the FCC website.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll study this further. I hope I&#8217;m understanding all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quanah</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24462</link>
		<dc:creator>quanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24462</guid>
		<description>Thanks, B. Williams. The last I talked to KTVT (11) they were pleased. Last summer.
WFAA (8) is the most viewed of the Dallas big network stations and all is well on cable systems such as Waco&#039;s overbuilder Grande,Temple&#039;s Centrovision, and Durant, OK Communicomm. Waco, Temple, Killeen Time Warner dumped WFAA 8 Dec. 31, 2008. Grande picks WFAA 8 off air easier and better than the analog days, as does Centrovision&#039;s four single cut 8 antennas at Moody.

KUSA 9 Denver, and KCEN 9 Waco tell me all is well. KCEN is irked because a Fort Worth station is broadcasting on 9 at the Cedar Hill tower farm. I&#039;m surprised the FCC permitted this. WFAA (8) did use DT 9 until the transition.

Fox 44 in Waco may request a new frequency, so they tell me. No number given.

KCEN 9 now has HD local news, weather, sports. Not bad for a Lawton/WF sized market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, B. Williams. The last I talked to KTVT (11) they were pleased. Last summer.<br />
WFAA (8) is the most viewed of the Dallas big network stations and all is well on cable systems such as Waco&#8217;s overbuilder Grande,Temple&#8217;s Centrovision, and Durant, OK Communicomm. Waco, Temple, Killeen Time Warner dumped WFAA 8 Dec. 31, 2008. Grande picks WFAA 8 off air easier and better than the analog days, as does Centrovision&#8217;s four single cut 8 antennas at Moody.</p>
<p>KUSA 9 Denver, and KCEN 9 Waco tell me all is well. KCEN is irked because a Fort Worth station is broadcasting on 9 at the Cedar Hill tower farm. I&#8217;m surprised the FCC permitted this. WFAA (8) did use DT 9 until the transition.</p>
<p>Fox 44 in Waco may request a new frequency, so they tell me. No number given.</p>
<p>KCEN 9 now has HD local news, weather, sports. Not bad for a Lawton/WF sized market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24461</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24461</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It appears to me that Channel 11 in Dallas is not happy with their VHF.&lt;/strong&gt;

On June 12, 2009, KTVT moved its digital broadcasts from channel 19 to channel 11. Due to widespread reception problems and a resulting loss of 57 percent of KTVT viewers, the station was granted permission via special temporary authorization by the FCC to move back to channel 19 on July 23, 2009.  On the same day, sister station KTXA was given permission via an STA to move back to channel 18, its transition period channel.  The channel change went into effect on August 4, 2009. Prior to the channel change, KTXA was simulcasting KTVT&#039;s programming on 21.2. KTVT broadcasts on channel 11 and on channel 19 and both stations use the virtual channel &quot;11.1&quot; causing many digital TV receivers to show channel 11.1 twice when tuning sequentially.

On September 10, 2009, the FCC issued a Report &amp; Order, approving KTVT&#039;s move from channel 11 to channel 19. On October 21, 2009, they filed a minor change application for their new allotment, which the FCC granted them a construction permit on November 19, 2009. Once construction of KTVT&#039;s maximized facilities ends, and file a License to Cover afterwards, then KTVT can terminate operations on channel 11 and operate solely on channel 19 permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It appears to me that Channel 11 in Dallas is not happy with their VHF.</strong></p>
<p>On June 12, 2009, KTVT moved its digital broadcasts from channel 19 to channel 11. Due to widespread reception problems and a resulting loss of 57 percent of KTVT viewers, the station was granted permission via special temporary authorization by the FCC to move back to channel 19 on July 23, 2009.  On the same day, sister station KTXA was given permission via an STA to move back to channel 18, its transition period channel.  The channel change went into effect on August 4, 2009. Prior to the channel change, KTXA was simulcasting KTVT&#8217;s programming on 21.2. KTVT broadcasts on channel 11 and on channel 19 and both stations use the virtual channel &#8220;11.1&#8243; causing many digital TV receivers to show channel 11.1 twice when tuning sequentially.</p>
<p>On September 10, 2009, the FCC issued a Report &amp; Order, approving KTVT&#8217;s move from channel 11 to channel 19. On October 21, 2009, they filed a minor change application for their new allotment, which the FCC granted them a construction permit on November 19, 2009. Once construction of KTVT&#8217;s maximized facilities ends, and file a License to Cover afterwards, then KTVT can terminate operations on channel 11 and operate solely on channel 19 permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quanah</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24460</link>
		<dc:creator>quanah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24460</guid>
		<description>Something wrong all over the country? Both 9 and 10 in Waco perform as well as expected. Ditto 8 and 11 in Dallas. Chance of KCEN and KWTX or WFAA and KTVT seeking move to UHF? Non existant. Your 7 and 9 have something amiss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something wrong all over the country? Both 9 and 10 in Waco perform as well as expected. Ditto 8 and 11 in Dallas. Chance of KCEN and KWTX or WFAA and KTVT seeking move to UHF? Non existant. Your 7 and 9 have something amiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggore</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24459</link>
		<dc:creator>ggore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24459</guid>
		<description>I think Servicetech is right, Hearst-Argyle/KOCO doesn&#039;t care about over-the-air broadcasting and thinks most people get their networks along with a satellite package.   They had their signals removed from all translators a few years ago, while the rest are still up and running.  A good portion do get their TV through satellite, but I would wager a lot more get it over the air.

Which brings up another problem, since KSBI has no translators in northwest Oklahoma, we can&#039;t receive their DT-51 signal because of a KOCB translator signal on channel 51 on the Seiling tower.  There isn&#039;t much worth watching on KSBI but an occasional Thunder game would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Servicetech is right, Hearst-Argyle/KOCO doesn&#8217;t care about over-the-air broadcasting and thinks most people get their networks along with a satellite package.   They had their signals removed from all translators a few years ago, while the rest are still up and running.  A good portion do get their TV through satellite, but I would wager a lot more get it over the air.</p>
<p>Which brings up another problem, since KSBI has no translators in northwest Oklahoma, we can&#8217;t receive their DT-51 signal because of a KOCB translator signal on channel 51 on the Seiling tower.  There isn&#8217;t much worth watching on KSBI but an occasional Thunder game would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24458</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24458</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wanting to drop the local channels package from my satellite service and save some money, but don&#039;t have a reliable ABC affiliate. &lt;strong&gt; It&#039;s KOCO that causes me to get the locals from a pay service. &lt;/strong&gt; (They&#039;re the only one I watch through the dish, I get better local service with my antenna than what the dish provides.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wanting to drop the local channels package from my satellite service and save some money, but don&#8217;t have a reliable ABC affiliate. <strong> It&#8217;s KOCO that causes me to get the locals from a pay service. </strong> (They&#8217;re the only one I watch through the dish, I get better local service with my antenna than what the dish provides.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: servicetech</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24456</link>
		<dc:creator>servicetech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24456</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think KOCO is too concerned, most people get their signal through a pay TV service. It would be interesting to see how many get local channels OTA vs. using a pay service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think KOCO is too concerned, most people get their signal through a pay TV service. It would be interesting to see how many get local channels OTA vs. using a pay service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24455</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24455</guid>
		<description>From where I sit, I get channel 9.1 around 94 - 95 percent strength, and 39.1 pegs out over 100 percent.  I&#039;ve not noticed problems with 9.1 VHF broadcast.  13.1 &amp; 13.2 hit me between 85 - 90 percent strength.  They seem to be doing quite well on VHF.  From the back side of my antenna, I&#039;m getting 11.1, 11.2, and 11.3 VHF (KSWO).  Of all the VHF signals I get, KOCO is the only one that cannot stay above the minimum acceptable signal strength.

I wonder if their advertisers understand that KOCO&#039;s signal doesn&#039;t cover a fraction of their audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From where I sit, I get channel 9.1 around 94 &#8211; 95 percent strength, and 39.1 pegs out over 100 percent.  I&#8217;ve not noticed problems with 9.1 VHF broadcast.  13.1 &amp; 13.2 hit me between 85 &#8211; 90 percent strength.  They seem to be doing quite well on VHF.  From the back side of my antenna, I&#8217;m getting 11.1, 11.2, and 11.3 VHF (KSWO).  Of all the VHF signals I get, KOCO is the only one that cannot stay above the minimum acceptable signal strength.</p>
<p>I wonder if their advertisers understand that KOCO&#8217;s signal doesn&#8217;t cover a fraction of their audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggore</title>
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/2010/01/31/is-koco-dt-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-24454</link>
		<dc:creator>ggore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvok.com/?p=3724#comment-24454</guid>
		<description>Channel 9 has major problems with their VHF signal and are doing something about it.  They turned their UHF 39 transmitter back on and are in the process of upping its power and have petitioned the FCC for permission to abandon their VHF channel.  Our cable system receives a much stronger and more reliable UHF signal from them even though they are not yet at full power.   KOCO on the other hand, sits there and talks about &quot;plans&quot;.  Top-mounting their antenna is something they should have been ready to do on the day of the analog shutdown like 99% of the stations in the country.  They were given a UHF-DT assignment in the beginning but they protested, wanting to stay on VHF, and not only that, on the SAME channel as another station 90 miles away!   Hearst-Argyle screwed this up royally right from the start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Channel 9 has major problems with their VHF signal and are doing something about it.  They turned their UHF 39 transmitter back on and are in the process of upping its power and have petitioned the FCC for permission to abandon their VHF channel.  Our cable system receives a much stronger and more reliable UHF signal from them even though they are not yet at full power.   KOCO on the other hand, sits there and talks about &#8220;plans&#8221;.  Top-mounting their antenna is something they should have been ready to do on the day of the analog shutdown like 99% of the stations in the country.  They were given a UHF-DT assignment in the beginning but they protested, wanting to stay on VHF, and not only that, on the SAME channel as another station 90 miles away!   Hearst-Argyle screwed this up royally right from the start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

