<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>HDTV In Oklahoma &#187; All Posts</title>
		<atom:link href="http://www.hdtvok.com/forums/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/forums/rss/</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
		<language>en</language>

		
		
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5200</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: KFOR reception problems in SW Oklahoma?]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5200</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>cableguy278</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I saw a post on their website saying that they were having problems. Thanks to everyone for their replies, though. I thought I had a problem here.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5199</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: KFOR reception problems in SW Oklahoma?]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5199</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>TVVoiceGuy</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>They mentioned on their news earlier in the week that they were having some sort of technical difficulties, and that their engineers were working to correct the problem.  I do not believe the problem is only in  SW Oklahoma.  I have one TV in my home on antenna and am having difficulties receiving them here in the city as well.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5198</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: KFOR reception problems in SW Oklahoma?]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5198</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>cableguy278</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Dennis, thanks for your info on this. I&#8217;m still seeing it today both at home and in Hobart. I will call someone at KFOR tomorrow and see if there really is a problem. I hoped maybe someone else out there might chime in and tell us if they&#8217;re seeing this too.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5197</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: KFOR reception problems in SW Oklahoma?]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5197</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I noticed a similar issue during Meet the Press Sunday morning. I was downstairs where I stream programming to my Apple TV and it was breaking up more than usual. I did not look at the recording I made to see if it was in the original feed. I&#8217;m in Stillwater so this may be a problem overall with their signal.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5196</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[KFOR reception problems in SW Oklahoma?]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/kfor-reception-problems-in-sw-oklahoma/#post-5196</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>cableguy278</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I thought I might give it a shot to ask if anyone on here is having glitchy reception of KFOR. My cable headend that I maintain has been having very intermittent signal levels of it for a few days now, and I thought it was just something wrong here. Today, however, I was in Hobart all day and was watching KFOR on their cable system (CableONE) and I noticed that they were having the exact same reception issues I was having in Carnegie. Basically, about every minute or so, the screen just pixellates and the audio garbles up for a second or two. Is anyone else out there seeing this or have any suggestions? Our cable headend antennas are 275 feet up and I&#8217;ve seen the same thing on both our yagi antennas and a parabolic UHF dish antenna, both located up that high.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/tv-antena-breakover-mast/#post-5165</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: TV antena breakover mast]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/tv-antena-breakover-mast/#post-5165</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I know someone who might be interested. Do you have a picture? Also, where are you located?</p>
<ul id="bbp-reply-revision-log-5165" class="bbp-reply-revision-log">
<li id="bbp-reply-revision-log-5165-item-5166" class="bbp-reply-revision-log-item">
		This reply was modified 143 days ago by <a href="http://www.hdtvok.com/users/admin/" title="View Dennis Whiteman's profile"><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/a7c0a0be014dfcb7aebdb24d0c491a36?s=14&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D14&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-14 photo' height='14' width='14' /></a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hdtvok.com/users/admin/" title="View Dennis Whiteman's profile">Dennis Whiteman</a>.
	</li>
</ul>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-added-5-new-hd-channels-on-10-27/#post-5164</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Cox added 5 new HD channels on 10-27]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-added-5-new-hd-channels-on-10-27/#post-5164</link>
					<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Sooner Al</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Cox, at least in the OKC market, has never had HDNet or HDNet movies&#8230;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-added-5-new-hd-channels-on-10-27/#post-5159</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Cox added 5 new HD channels on 10-27]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-added-5-new-hd-channels-on-10-27/#post-5159</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I thought they already had the HDNet channels&#8230;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/tv-antena-breakover-mast/#post-5158</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[TV antena breakover mast]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/tv-antena-breakover-mast/#post-5158</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>katbshep</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Hello,<br />
Thought I ran across someone looking for an antena mast. I have one I would like to find a new home for. It is approx.45 to 50 height, and weighs about a ton. I found someone with a crane that can take it down and haul it for $200. (You might know someone that can do it for less) So if anyone is interested please let me know.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/fall-2011-schedule/#post-5156</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Fall 2011 schedule]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/fall-2011-schedule/#post-5156</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I guess I don&#8217;t watch KFOR enough to know when the schedule is messed up.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/fall-2011-schedule/#post-5155</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Fall 2011 schedule]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/fall-2011-schedule/#post-5155</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>mdeatherage</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Is it even worth pointing out that KFOR has changed its schedule and apparently told no one?  The &#8220;TV Schedule&#8221; link on KFOR.com links to Zap2it.com, which does not have the new &#8220;NewsChannel 4 at 4&#8243; newscast.  In fact, it still has the old schedule listed for the next two weeks, complete with new versions of shows no longer in those time slots.</p>
<p>Seriously, they&#8217;ve been semi-advertising this for a month and didn&#8217;t bother to update the program guide services?  Where is Jeopardy now?  Is it on once or twice a day?  Does <i>anything</i> online have KFOR&#8217;s correct schedule?  KFOR itself sure doesn&#8217;t.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/ktul-news-goes-hd/#post-5151</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[KTUL news goes HD]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/ktul-news-goes-hd/#post-5151</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>doublej</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>KTUL finally made the switch this morning to HD for their news and studio programming. Looks like the field reporters are still using SD equipment.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-5150</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Dear KOKH]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-5150</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>kenny9966</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Send a complaint to Sinclair broadcasting not KOKH. The people who work at KOKH only do what their bosses tell them to do. If that is to break in during programming and not commercials then its clearly sinclairs fault not KOKH. Cant blame someone doing their job.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-5147</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Dear KOKH]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-5147</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 04:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>doublej</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I could have done without the Tulsa stations going to full blown weather coverage at 4:30 this afternoon when the storms were just forming in western oklahoma.  By 8:00 they hit Tulsa as just strong winds and heavy rain and of course the finale of dancing with the stars was postponed by KTUL until this weekend, even though the winner will be plastered all over a hundred websites and many entertainment shows tomorrow.  Here it is 11pm and they are still harping on the storms as they enter Arkansas.  At least KJRH and KOTV have got a clue and announced they were now moving regular programming to the subchannels in these situations.  My stepmom was happy when I told her to switch to 2.2 for the Biggest Loser finale and this weeks episode of The Voice instead of having to endure the constant weather dribble. I realize this is important at times but just showing a radar map and talking constantly about the pretty colors, causes me to go to a satellite channel.  It&#8217;s Oklahoma we have learned to live with tornadoes and don&#8217;t need Hollywood weathermen having a weathergasm constantly harping it to us.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-5145</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Reply To: Dear KOKH]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-5145</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>My biggest problem is when I record a show on my DVR and go to watch it a week later only to see sensational footage about wildfires or weathermen running around about tornadoes in counties their station doesn&#8217;t even reach.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-4443</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Dear KOKH&#8230;]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/dear-kokh/#post-4443</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>mdeatherage</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>You really have to get your shit together.  You are in <em>serious</em> danger of replacing KFOR as the biggest joke in Oklahoma City media.  Yes, KFOR&mdash;the station that buys syndicated segments like &ldquo;Mr. Food&rdquo; for the noon news but refuses to show the segment&rsquo;s URL on screen, replacing it with the KFOR <em>street address</em> as if people who want more information are going to send a self-addressed stamped envelope.  They haven&rsquo;t figured out that using Google is easier than traveling back to 1975.</p>
<p>But I digress.  First, let me state that you clearly did the right thing by breaking into broadcasting when there is a <em>tornado warning</em> in the <em>over-the-air broadcast area</em>.  That is <em>always</em> justified, even if it pre-empts Oprah&rsquo;s last show or the Super Bowl or whatever else.</p>
<p>The way you did it, however, was abysmally bad.  I was watching because it hasn&rsquo;t been the greatest week and I wanted to unwind by watching and keeping score for a baseball game.  You were my only option, because when FOX Saturday baseball is on, it&rsquo;s exclusive&mdash;no matter what package you buy from MLB or anyone else, your only choice during a FOX broadcast window is the FOX game, whether it&rsquo;s one you want to watch or not.  Rangers vs. Phillies was my last choice of the three games available, but there are lots of Rangers fans around here, so I understood.</p>
<p>I hope you understand how much you pissed them off tonight.</p>
<p>First, as you well know, you&rsquo;re the only remaining OKC network affiliates (KOKH: Fox 25, and KOCB: The CW 34) who have not invested in the equipment to create, overlay, or rebroadcast HD video.  Your excellent HD signals haven&rsquo;t changed since about 2004, so when you have graphics to overlay, you drop into standard definition.  It&rsquo;s not bad SD like KFOR&rsquo;s was, but it&rsquo;s not great either.  Just as KFOR has to learn it&rsquo;s not 1975, you guys have to move beyond 2004 and start broadcasting local content&mdash;including weather graphics&mdash;in HD.  <strong>We know the difference.</strong></p>
<p>Second, the break-ins were just awful.  In the first one, around the 3rd or 4th inning, there was just background noise and dead air for several seconds until the meteorologist started talking about the storms.  I&rsquo;m assuming she was a meteorologist, because even two hours of break-ins later, <em>she never mentioned her name</em>.  In the first break-in, she said storms were moving to the north and east, and drew a storm tracker showing the storms moving south by southwest.  She couldn&rsquo;t pronounce the name of a town affected by the storm and said so.</p>
<p>As the game continued (for people in other markets, at least), we continually saw break-ins with increasingly useless information.  After one or two pitches in an inning, you&rsquo;d break in again with the Tornado Warning alert, and then tell us the same three things over and over.  Miraculously, however, you always managed to say &ldquo;we&rsquo;re going to return you to programming&rdquo; just as the innings ended and the commercials started.  Much like the widely-known joke that is KFOR, this is trying to give the appearance of caring about viewers without sacrificing anything&mdash;except your viewers, who turn away because all they see is irrelevant information and ads.  This is the age of the Internet.  We can&rsquo;t watch the game online but we can see pitch-by-pitch tracking and we know when the inning is ending just as clearly as you do.  I think seven different times, you &ldquo;returned to programming&rdquo; just to catch ads, then broke in again after one or two pitches.</p>
<p>This might be OK if your break-ins were useful.  They were not.</p>
<p>Although you seemed to have storm trackers in the field, we only occasionally saw video from them (until a short of an actual funnel late in the 8th inning), and never heard any sound.  We don&rsquo;t even know who was talking to us as there were no in-studio shots&mdash;just weather graphics.  So each break went through a loop like this:</p>
<p>&ldquo;There&rsquo;s a tornado warning for [specific area], with potential funnels [here and here].  We&rsquo;ll talk about that radar picture for a minute.  Now we&rsquo;ll show you Millenium and show that there&rsquo;s a hail core, and talk about that for 30 seconds.  This is all in the area of a larger severe thunderstorm warning, and that&rsquo;s for this area.  And there&rsquo;s a larger tornado watch, shown as all these counties in green.  But that includes a tornado warning for [specific area]&#8230;&rdquo;  (repeat until you turn off the TV in disgust)</p>
<p>No studio shots. No field reports. I <em>guarantee</em> you that anyone in the affected area turned to KFOR, KOCO, or KWTV after the first of these break-ins so they could get on-camera meteorologists, clear field reports, and HD images.  Had this been in my area, no matter how much I wanted to watch baseball, I couldn&rsquo;t have stayed with such useless information.</p>
<p>We saw about two consecutive half-innings in the last part of the game, and saw the top of the 9th for the end of the game, but that was all that was uninterrupted in favor of <em>low-quality information</em>.  Not only that, but your weather graphics (the reason what baseball we saw was in SD) were way too dated.  They alternated between the tornado warning and the much less important severe thunderstorm warning and tornado watch, so someone tuning in wouldn&rsquo;t have figured much out &#8212; they&rsquo;d see a small baseball picture letterboxed on four sides and tune away.  Perhaps this is why you justified replacing most of the baseball game with information that could&mdash;<em>and should</em>&mdash;have been replaced by modern weather graphics in HD.</p>
<p>Remember, if your weather presentation is so annoying that you drive people away from your station (or to a cable channel), you&rsquo;ve not only not performed a public service, you&rsquo;ve performed a <em>disservice</em>.  You want people to keep watching the game so that if something affecting a larger area (like Ada, or Shawnee, or OKC) crops up, you can warn them.  When you do it this badly, you just make people stop watching altogether.</p>
<p>You can&rsquo;t fix the graphics overnight because Sinclair is apparently too cheap to invest in their OKC properties and keep them up to date.  You can, however, at the very least, do as much as possible to keep the weather information brief and relevant.  Don&rsquo;t drop out of HD to show irrelevant graphics.  Don&rsquo;t pre-empt programming to show low-quality break-ins with no new information, no on-camera personalities, and no field reports.  Don&rsquo;t &ldquo;return us to programming&rdquo; just for the ads, because <strong>we&rsquo;re not that stupid</strong>.  We know what you&rsquo;re doing, and we stop watching your channel.</p>
<p>Break in <em>during</em> the commercials, update us quickly, and if necessary, send us to KOCB 34 for continuous coverage since you have the luxury of doing that.  According to the schedule, KOCB had only reruns of <em>Seinfeld</em> and <em>Two and a Half Men</em> on tonight&mdash;incorrectly identified as in HD, when all of us here know KOCB does not broadcast any syndicated programming in HD, and we also know that <em>Seinfeld</em> <strong>was not recorded in HD</strong>.  You could have had the best of both worlds with brief KOKH break-ins and whatever KOCB coverage you wanted, but you did it exactly backwards.</p>
<p>This is why, when I have a chance to decide to watch local programming, I <em>vastly</em> prefer KOCO.  They do it in HD.  They don&rsquo;t break in capriciously.  They break in over commercials for sports or prime-time programming unless it&rsquo;s a tornado warning, and even there they keep the broadcast full of relevant, changing information.</p>
<p>I have a choice next Saturday as to whether I watch baseball in primetime, or do something else at night and watch baseball in the afternoon.  Guess which option I&rsquo;m going to choose?  Guess whether I&rsquo;m the only one who feels this way?</p>
<p>You guys need to get your shit together.  Boobery like this can&rsquo;t be excused by your beautiful and stable HD images from the networks.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/suddenlink-local-hd-channels-down/#post-3937</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Suddenlink Local HD Channels Down]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/suddenlink-local-hd-channels-down/#post-3937</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>redrings</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I&#8217;m in stillwater BTW.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/suddenlink-local-hd-channels-down/#post-3936</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Suddenlink Local HD Channels Down]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/suddenlink-local-hd-channels-down/#post-3936</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>redrings</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Came back home from Thanksgiving at the parents and found out that my HD local channels from Suddenlink have stopped working.  Survivor didn&#8217;t record last wednesday night, so I know it&#8217;s been down since then &#8211; anyone else having trouble?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/is-koco-news-in-hd/#post-3938</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Is Koco news in HD]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/is-koco-news-in-hd/#post-3938</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>clark willis</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Was KOCO 5 news in HDTV?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-making-changes-to-ondemand/#post-3940</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Cox making changes to OnDemand]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-making-changes-to-ondemand/#post-3940</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>jedicurt</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://www.coxhelpcenter.com/CoxFAQRelatedDocsList/NewOnDemandGuide.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.coxhelpcenter.com/CoxFAQRelatedDocsList/NewOnDemandGuide.pdf</a></p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-making-changes-to-ondemand/#post-3939</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Cox making changes to OnDemand]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/cox-making-changes-to-ondemand/#post-3939</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>jedicurt</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I was watching tv last night and saw a commercial from cox talking about changes that are being made to the OnDemand service and all of this is coming in September</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/links-to-forums-no-longer-appears-on-main-page/#post-3942</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Links to forums no longer appears on main page]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/links-to-forums-no-longer-appears-on-main-page/#post-3942</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Dennis Whiteman</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>The link to these forums will be coming back. You probably didn&#8217;t notice, but I made some small changes as part of a bigger upgrading I&#8217;m doing and part of that involved removing those links. Once I&#8217;m done, the forums will be better integrated into the site.</p>
<p>I had a setback this week because I needed to integrate a new Mac Mini as my workstation because my laptop is on its last legs.</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/links-to-forums-no-longer-appears-on-main-page/#post-3941</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Links to forums no longer appears on main page]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/links-to-forums-no-longer-appears-on-main-page/#post-3941</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>jedicurt</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>the link to the forums is not on the main page anymore&#8230; was this intentional? or if not, was it moved and i just can&#8217;t find it?  i guess it&#8217;s not a really big deal, i just have to manually type it in the address bar, but i am lazy.  anyways. figured i would ask and see</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/big-changes-to-cox-coming/#post-4781</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Big changes to Cox coming]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/big-changes-to-cox-coming/#post-4781</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I was in Moore today and stopped by their Moore office and what a joke. They acted as if they didn&#8217;t know what new equipment I was talking about, when I mentioned Cisco boxes they just said we heard they were coming and that was all they knew. That was the second experience I&#8217;ve had with that store and will not go back. The folks in Norman have a much nicer attitude and even if they don&#8217;t know the answer to something they will at least ask one of the other employees and act like the care. The Moore office really sucks when it comes to how they interact with the customer.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/big-changes-to-cox-coming/#post-4780</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Big changes to Cox coming]]></title>
					<link>http://www.hdtvok.com/topic/big-changes-to-cox-coming/#post-4780</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>hdtver</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I called Cox OKC this morning for additional information and got a few more teasers.  Mid-August is the projected start up time for distribution and Tulsa will get them first. If you already have a HD DVR, you simply swap it out for the multi-room DVR from Cisco.  No specific technical details available yet.  Perhaps details are being discussed in different parts of the country where Cox has or is about to roll out the new multi-room DVRs.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>


